April 29, 2010

The Sword May Be Double-edged


But there is still only one sword.


Dick Henson's Letter-To-The Editor in the Frederick News Post last Tuesday begs, pleads, SCREAMS for a response.
He is right to be concerned about the power accruing to the Presidency; it is indeed the biggest danger Americans face. Although I am glad to see that someone recognizes this danger, it is evident that still, Mr. Henson does not yet quite get it.

I'm reminded of the quip Jon Stewart made on his The Daily Show some time prior to the last presidential election. On the show he said: Thanks to Dick Cheney, Hillary Clinton will be the most powerful President in history. Now, he may have gotten the winner of the election wrong, but he got the danger, I would say crisis, exactly right.
Democrat, Republican, it obviously doesn't matter. It makes no difference if it's W. Bush, Obama, Reagan, or Clinton, the power just seems to accumulate to the Executive; like gravity operating in reverse, the power moves upward to the 'that singular of power'.

This is not by chance; this is not one party making bad decisions, looking only to their own power and control with no thought to the future. Sure they will say that they plan for a century of Republican control of our lives or whatever, but they know that will not happen within the current political system framework.

I constantly remind you: do not assume the people in political power are stupid, don't see the big picture, are dumber than you.
They're not.

The right question to ask, is why. Why is it that everyone elected to political office operates in the same mode, works toward some common goal?

Why, Democratic or Republican, does the government get larger, spend more money, implement stricter laws, violate the Constitution more? Do they all think they will have a better chance of getting elected next time if the country is in worse shape that the year before? Is it that the party out of power thinks that by making things worse, they will get to be IN power next time?

If any of that is even remotely true then are we anything other than doomed?

But the issue could be even more sinister than that.

It could be that the people who really run things have one agenda, one unified aim, one plan for the future of not only this country but the world. It could be that that one group uses the two political parties as tools to accomplish their aim.

What we need to do is to reveal the invisible hand, to pull back the curtain, expose the truth.

You won't get that from the spokespersons for either of the two political parties.

You won't get that from Newsweek or The New York Times.

You will get that here. You will get that information from the Greens and in other places that may be even harder to find.
But finding that information is worth the effort. It's worthwhile for you to find out what others are thinking and saying.

That double-edged sword does indeed cut both ways. Unfortunately for us, both directions cut us out and cut us down.

The only way to stop that is to disarm the ones wielding the sword.

Find them.

April 26, 2010

Florida: Number One


Well, it looks like this outskirt of civilization has finally outdone California in something: killing its citizens with Tasers.

In an excellent front page article in this Sunday's St. Petersburg Times, reporter Meg Laughlin reports on the killing of Derrick Humbert by Bradenton police. They shot him with 50,000 volts of electricity because he had been riding his bike at night without lights and ran when they stopped him.

Her article reveals that the slogan of Taser International, "Taser early, Taser often" repeated in training exercises for police officers around the country. Their goal is to get it into people's mind (that's our minds) that the Taser is effective and does not cause injury.

Of course, shooting people with thousands of volts of electricity for no good reason is not isolated to Florida. We have that issue right at home in Frederick.

The concern, of course, as reported in the article, is that these exaggerations (lies actually) of Taser International in their marketing of this vicious, deadly weapon "provide the basis for local police policy".

And just what is local police policy on the use of non-lethal deadly weapons on people accused of no crime?

We don't know. The police policy manual is secret. We don't have the right to see it, read it, or comment on it.

The Department of Justice and the Police Executive Research Forum, according to the article recommended: "That a subject fleeing should not be the sole justification for police use of (a Taser)."

Is it? We don't know.

What we do know is that, as in Florida, whenever the police use deadly force, the officer is always exonerated.

What is needed is a Police Civilian Review Panel with authority, oversight, and real power to control local police forces.

In this age of police authority wildly out of control; fears of Terrorists, the outraged unemployed, and angry environmentalists, many people willingly give up their liberty to people they think will keep them safe.

Of course, the job of the police is to protect privilege, property, and the establishment. To that end, they will violate the rights of any individual, knowing that they will never be held accountable.

As long as there are people who will take from others, hurt others, we need a police force. But we must recognize that military and para-military forces (like the police) are anathema to a free society. They must be tolerated, but tightly leashed. Their job is to catch criminals; they have no part to play in reducing crime or addressing the causes of crime.

They have no right to attack people they think might be thinking of possibly committing a crime.

People must control police.

We need civilian control of the police now.

April 19, 2010

What's The Matter With Florida?

Progressives don't seem to be very angry, maybe not even angry at all. It's not like we don't have good reason to be angry; in fact a lot of very good reasons, going all the way back to Bill Clinton. Remember NAFTA, Welfare 'Reform', triangulation?



And don't even get me started about W Bush!! There's plenty there to be angry about that's for sure. How did we allow the massive vote fraud to be initiated let alone perpetuated and then sit by while one member of the Supreme Court completed a coup d'etat that installed the most anti-American leadership in the history of the United States?


We don't need to go over the long, long, hideous list of atrocities commited by that regime over it's horrendous 8 year reign. But I will anyway with some of my personal favorites: the first major terrorist attack on the United States ever; Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq; Colin Powell at the United Nations; invasion of Afghanistan and then Iraq; massive domestic spying; illegal arrests and detentions; secret torture chambers and prisons hidden around the globe, our very own Gulag; more and more extreme spying on US citirezens as well as others; executions of terrorist suspects regardless of nationality.
Oh God, you and I know I could go on forever.

But let's look at some things that should really have made us Progressives really mad, made us rise up out of our rocking chairs and local coffee shops; things like: allowing ourselves to be blamed for Al Gore's loss, media consolidation, ballot access, being locked out of the political system and the social debate, increasingly corrupt electoral process.
It's not like we haven't had our chances. So many people have worked so hard, organized, run for office, spoken out. But the machine is extraordinarily powerful, its reach vast, its influence overwhelming, its malevolence boundless.

We have every right to be angry, to rage against the machine; to do battle using more than just words.
I have spent the last two months in Florda; that's right, that social backwater, that outskirt of civilization and it has been an education, let me tell you!

The anger from fear is intense across the full range that makes up the political spectrum in Florida; from the radical, right-wing Tea Baggers all the way to the moderate Republicans.

The big political fight right now is about who will be the Republican candidate for the US Senate. The contenders are Charlie Crist, the sitting Liberal governor and Marco Rubio, the True Republican. It seems Crist's sin was taking federal stimulus money - ObamaDollars. This is a state where something like 1 in 9 citizens are in foreclosure and 1 in 7 unemployed.

Since Crist embraced Obama (figuatively and literally) he went from clear winner in the primary to clear loser.

Forget about the Democratic candidate in this race, he hasn't even a name or so it would seem if you read the local liberal media, The St. Pete Times.

To distinguish himself, Crist has just vetoed the so-called Teacher Tenure Bill. This was a heavily favored (by the Republican legislature) bill that tied teacher salary and retention to student performance and essentially eliminated tenure for teachers in the state.

The outrage was so great it caused major thunderstorms throughout the Gulf coast region this past weekend (at least that's what I think caused them).

But what's really fascinating is what passes for understanding of the issues and and how to fix things. As usual, even among Conservatives, there is a level of understanding as to the nature of the problems, but only buzz words and phrases when it comes to addressing those problems.

Take for example the suburban couple and their one child - hard working, 2-wage earner family that is just ekeing by. Mother lost her job but found another in the medical / social services field, dad had to take a substantial salary cut just to keep his job; they have a continuing battle with their home insurance company to get reimbursed for damage to their home from storms that occurred several years ago.

Devoted, committed, rabid Tea Baggers. They cannot discuss the issues with anyone who does not see the world through the Tea Bag lens; it is Liberals, anti-Christians, and Obama that are at the base of all ills in this country.

The retired couple are angry, at the Republicans. Even though he is retired from a mega-corporation he is bitter; his pension and company medical coverage were reduced when the company started crying poverty when the dot com bubble burst. He now likes to tell everyone how great he is treated by the doctors at the VA. They lost money in the stock market when Enron and the telecoms went broke. They decry the vast amounts of money poured into Republican and Democratic poltical campaigns and lament their own deminished financial situation even though they are probably millionaires (or close to it).

In 2000, he thought Nader made a lot a sense and wondered why he didn't run as a Democrat. He still thinks Nader makes a lot of sense, sees the problem of money in politics and the fact that money buys everything.

For both of these groups, that's where the analysis ends. The system is either corrupt or broken and change is needed. If you're the Tea Bagger only radical, right-wing demogogues can resolve the issues that plague them. If you're retired, the answer apparently, is eliminate the Income Tax.

Then along comes a 40-something with a Masters Degree in Political Science who teaches at 5 different colleges in the area.

At last I think, someone I can talk to who has the pulse of the young people, young himself, worldly, well-read.

"Did you see the interview on Democracy Now! yesterday?", I eagerly ask.

The lip curls.

"Do you at least read Mother Jones?", I try. The eyes narrow and a sneer crosses his face.
Alas, his world revolves around Time, and Newsweek, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. All else is trivial, conspiratorial, or worse, anti-Capitalist.
Is there no hope?
But, we are able to talk. He doesn't know anything about Bill Clinton stating that the economic plan for Haiti, concocted by the greatest financial minds in the world was an abject failure. I guess that little gem from the man that made NAFTA possible hadn't made it into Newsweek yet.

Let me know when it does.

He decries the rampant, uncontrolled sprawl development across his state, but doesn't understand who's at fault. Well, he does if you tell him, but then he falls back on who's running, who should get elected, as if anyone of them would make the least bit of difference.

Then he tells me that he's in favor of Open Primaries in Florida. I think he thinks, since I'm a "liberal" this is something we can agree on.

"Why?", I ask. What is so great about open primaries? Why would you want me, for example, a radical, left-wing Green voting for who your Republican candidate should be?

It seems he thinks the Party of the Republic has moved too far to the right; its been hijacked, taken over by the wacko fringe set. Open primaries will, he says, make it possible to push the party back, I guess to its Grand Old roots, the center, where it should be.
He apparently wasn't thinking about (or maybe not caring about) the fact that open primaries meant that the wacko-fringe set would be able to vote in the Democratic primaries and push that nobel bastion of liberalism more toward the center.
There's no difference now between the two parties, I said. Wouldn't such a scheme ensure that would be even more true than it is now, and not only that, but ensure it would stay that way? Shouldn't the goal of our electoral system to be to ensure fairness, and help move us toward democracy? I said my preference was that there be no primaries at all, that people should be able to vote for whoever they want. That would be democratic. His response was explosive. In fact, it was the explosion heard throughout the house.

I went on (do I have a death wish or what?). I talked about preference voting, IRV as options. He calmed a little when I mentioned Proportional Representation; he'd heard of that (thank God for Time magazine!).

The next day brought amazing news; since it was clear Crist could not win the Republican primary, he was thinking of running for the Senate as an Independent! Polls were showing that in a 3-way race, he would win, leading with 30% of the vote.

My political science friend was ecstatic; Crist would win and save the party, at least in Florida, and perhaps save the Republic as well from the ravages of the savage right.

Still hoping he could see the benefit of alternative voting systems, I asked what kind of representation is that if the person who wins has only 30% of those who voted?

That, apparently was the lsat straw for he went on a 30 minute tiraid, pacing, screaming at the top of his voice, permitting no interruption.

"It's the law", he shouted, "we have a plurality system!". Hw went on to call me a Communist, and recommended I move to China or Russia. "Cuba" someone chimed in. I was nonplussed. Where had I heard that before?
"I love my county!" he screamed. Therefore apparently, he supports the system as it was before being corrupted by all the money, mean-spiritedness, and radicals.
So, where does all that leave us Progressives? Shouldn't we be doing something? It became clear to me that the 'center', what we used to call Moderates, are lost. They see their old ways rapidly fading, as the song goes. They are afraid of change; hysterically afraid. You can see it in the way they react to Obama, health insurance 'reform', the war, deficits, the economyjust about anything in the news. Their world is changed, they understand that, forever.
To our credit, we're not angry, but energized, charged, anxious for change.
You know, Chomsky said once that there is no reason to Speak Truth To Power, Power already knows the truth, he said. What we need to do is speak Truth to the People.
We need to do that as much as we can; no matter how loudly we get yelled at.
Because I do belive that my 40-something friend is at home now, unable to get what I said out of his mind. He may hate it and me for that, but it bothers him; he's thinking that maybe, just maybe, he isn't right, that he's been wrong all along.
As we all know, self examination is hard.
And if he's not thinkng about it, then someone else will be.
The Time Has Come.
We, Progressives, Greens, will continue to work for the change that we know must made in order for us all to live.
We aren't working for some grand and glorious future. We see what needs to be done today.
We will speak and act on THAT vision.
































April 7, 2010

Property Rights Will Be At Risk

C. Paul Smith former Frederick City Alderman and Republican had a letter in today's Frederick News Post that requires comment. The letter reads in part:

The commissioners' plan to downzone properties around municipalities would sharply cut the values of these properties and would be a "taking" of property values that owners are powerless to stop. The front-page News-Post article of April 3 reports on one of dozens of properties that would be stripped of significant value by the proposed comprehensive plan.

The entire text of the letter is here.

This is my response which I've submitted to the Post:

Are we sick of Conservatives yet? How many times do we have to hear the same tired arguments from them about Property Rights, zoning, and “Takings”?
There is a basic belief at work in these arguments that needs to be put out of our misery once and for all: that giving more and more money to rich people is always a good thing.
Many have been conditioned to believe that people gain wealth by some type of free-market magic (or, in rare circumstances hard work). Only the taking away of wealth is done by man.
Nonsense.
Government zones land, including private property. We hear no bleating when agricultural land is ‘up-zoned’ to residential. In fact, if it’s our property we feel entitled to the new zoning.
Gandhi had a term for that kind of thing: Wealth Without Work
We never hear calls of ‘givings’ and demands for the property owner pay the community for their new, undeserved wealth.
In fact, we’re told that the new zoning, and the ensuing hundreds (or thousands) of new homes and strip malls will benefit the community.
No, at long last we are able to see past the greedy, Conservative mantra of ‘gimme gimme gimme’ and ‘more, more, more’.
Decades of the false idea that ‘I can do what I want with my property’ has brought us to the sorry state we are in.
At long last we clearly see that property decisions affect us all; we live in a community.

As I tried to bring out in my response, this issue is more than just about zoning and property; it's about community and how we think our economy should work.

I did a brief search for background information and found a good explanation of Takings at the Georgetown Environmental Law and Policy Institute.

These issues go to the core of assumptions that are no longer questioned and must be if we are to make the essential changes necessary to live in civilized society.

At PublicEye.org you can read an excellent analysis of Takings and Private Property rights.

Elections are coming here in Frederick County in a few months and there will be tremendous pressure to attack social and community movements under the guise of 'rebuilding the economy' and 'creating jobs'.

Now is the best chance we've had in a long time to not only question the basic assumptions that drive Capitalism, but attack them and move away from a predatory, destructive economic system.

April 6, 2010

How The Corporations Broke Ralph Nader And America, Too

Ralph Nader’s descent from being one of the most respected and powerful men in the country to being a pariah illustrates the totality of the corporate coup.

Read this fascinating and disturbing articles by Chris Hedges. The link is below.

And please see my earlier post about Michael Moore's attack on Nader on Democracy Now!.
This is part of what Michael Parenti calls Coincidence Theory I think.

Read the Hedges article

A Society Consumed By Locusts

Youth In The Age of Moral and Political Plagues:

"As the recent health care debate has made clear, the decades-long conservative campaign against the alleged abuses of 'big government' is far from over. In the 1980s, when Ronald Reagan insisted that government was the problem not the solution, he unleashed what was to become a neoliberal juggernaut against both the welfare state and the concept of the public good."

See the entire Truthout article here

April 5, 2010

A Message To Progressives

The comments made by Michael Moore during his interview with Amy Goodman on the March 23, 2010 edition of Democracy Now! cannot be allowed to stand without comment.


You can watch and read the entire interview here.



In this interview Moore makes the argument that left-oriented people (presumedly including Progressives) need to stick with the Democratic Party as the only hope for effecting systemic social change.

Apparently Moore believes that only Democrats will be able to overthrow Capitalism and lead the nation into the glorious Liberal future.

Right!

He says in the interview that Ralph Nader is somone who likes only the sound of his own voice and belittles him as out of touch with "the grassroots or the people." He ridicules Nader's runs for the presidency and quips, "What has that ever gotten us?".

Now Ralph Nader is not a Green of course, but he has spent what, the last 40 years of his life working for, advocating for, and implementing programs and policies that have saved millions of lives and had an impact on millions more? He has spent his life speaking out about the essential, basic issues of our lives: corporate fraud, waste, and abuse and for systemic, fundamental electoral and social reform.

He was and is a great man not only with understanding of the issues of our lives but in touch with the people.

But Moore unbelievably persists, "the game is rigged in America when it comes to third parties." he says. Therefore, it's a waste of time to be involved with them and the only option is to work within the One-Party system. The best way to effect change, he tells us is to join the Democratic Party and work within it to drive it to the left.

Where have we heard that before?

Right, we hear it over and over from liberal Democrats like Dennis Kucinich, who by the way is funded by the Democrats to run for president every 4 years just to draw left-leaning voters to the Democrats.

He takes principled stands on war, military occupations, health care ... until it comes to a vote.

Bloggers, talking heads, Daily Kos all say the same thing: want change? Vote Democrat.

Progressives know better however and we need to let everyone know that we know. We don't fall for the line. We didn't fall for False Hope in 1992 nor in 2009.

Progressives - Greens need to speak forcefully and publically when liberal lies are spread.

Greens will continue to fight and advocate for universal, single-payer health care.

Greens will continue to speak out against illegal, immoral wars and military occupations and for Peace.

Greens will continue to speak out against torture, Patriot Acts, and all assaults on our rights and liberty.

Moore says the game is rigged against us, that we can't win, that we shouldn't try, that we should just give up.

That we should just shut up!

Does he really believe Democrats will deliver us from the scourges of Capitalism?

He doesn't understand; the game is rigged against him as well.

It's clear that Moore and the people like him have an agenda; the Democrat agenda, to make sure we remain marginalized within a corrupt political system.

We must counter the plans of the anti-democratic corporate party at every turn; object to, and refute every False Claim and False Hope.

Every time.

As Greens we will continue to work for fair, open, publically financed campaigns. We will fight for equal recognition as a force in the political arena. And we will advocate for fair, democratic representation through the implementation of IRV, Rank Choice voting, and Proportional Representation voting systems.

Michael Moore does not speak for Progressives in this country nor offer any viable alternative or possibility for change.

The lie of the False Hope of Liberalism must be constantly and consistently exposed.

The time has come.

Spread the word.